Mid-term evaluation of the Global Strategy to Eliminate Yellow Fever Epidemics (EYE) 2017 - 2026
The mid-term evaluation was included as a milestone in the EYE strategy and in the WHO evaluation workplan 2022–2023, and was approved by the WHO Executive Board at its 150th session in January 2022. The purpose of the evaluation was to assess the relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of the strategy implementation to date and to review inclusion of gender, equity and human rights considerations. This included programme delivery aspects as well as strategy management and governance aspects.
The mandate to conduct a mid-term evaluation of the implementation of the Strategic Action Plan on Polio Transition (2018–2023) derives from the polio transition roadmap that was prepared to support implementation of the Strategic Action Plan. The objective of this formative evaluation was to assess the status of implementation of the Strategic Action Plan and to propose any modifications needed to adapt to the changing context. The evaluation focused on progress across the 20 polio transition priority countries and further investigated progress at the regional and global levels. It: (a) documented key achievements, best practices, challenges, gaps, and areas for improvement in the design and implementation of the Strategic Action Plan; (b) identified the key contextual factors and changes in the global public health realm that have affected the development and implementation of the Strategic Action Plan and the roadmap developed in 2018; and (c) made recommendations as appropriate on the way forward to enable the successful implementation of the plan. The Executive Summary of this evaluation report will be presented to the Seventy-fifth World Health Assembly in May 2022.
The mandate to conduct a comprehensive review of the WHO Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance derives from resolution WHA72.5 (2019). The overall purpose of this comprehensive review was to enhance current work on AMR. Based on the five primary objectives of the GAP AMR, the review documents successes, challenges and best practices, and provides lessons learned and recommendations for use by WHO and other GAP AMR stakeholders to guide future implementation of the GAP AMR and to inform decision-making on AMR.
The mandate to conduct a mid-point evaluation of the progress achieved in the implementation of the NCD-GAP derives from paragraph 1(1) of resolution WHA66.10 (2013) which endorsed the NCD-GAP. The purpose of the evaluation was to assess the accomplishments of the six objectives of the NCD-GAP as well as the lessons learned through implementation of the NCD-GAP in Member States, by international partners and non-State actors, and at the three levels of WHO. The evaluation report documents successes, challenges and gaps in the implementation of the NCD-GAP since 2013; provides lessons learned and recommendations to improve the implementation of the NCD-GAP until 2030; and provides inputs for the next WHO global status report on noncommunicable diseases, as well as other reports, including on contributions to reducing premature mortality from NCDs by promoting mental health, reducing air pollution and strengthening health systems. The executive summary of the evaluation report was presented to the 148th session of the Executive Board in January 2021.
EB148/7 Add.1 Executive Summary:
The terms of reference of the GCM/NCD included a provision for both a preliminary and a final evaluation. Building on the 2017 preliminary evaluation of the GCM/NCD, the objective of the final evaluation was to assess the effectiveness of the GCM/NCD, its added value and its continued relevance to the achievement of the 2025 voluntary global targets, including its possible extension. The scope of the final evaluation involved an assessment of the results derived from the implementation of the workplan covering the period 2018–2019, which reportedly took into account the recommendations of the preliminary evaluation, as well as the workplan for 2020. It also considered the lessons learned and the extent to which the recommendations of the preliminary evaluation were actioned, and to what effect. The executive summary of the evaluation report was presented to the 148th session of the Executive Board in January 2021.
EB148/7 Add2 Executive Summary:
The purpose of this evaluation was to draw lessons learned from implementation of the Global strategy and action plan in order to inform the WHO Secretariat’s work on the Decade of Healthy Ageing (2020–2030).
The Evaluation of the WHO Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme, with a special focus on the current neglected tropical diseases road map for implementation, documented the Programme’s successes, challenges and gaps during the period 2014-2017 and provided lessons learned and strategic recommendations for the design and operationalization of the next steps, addressing the remaining toll of neglected tropical diseases in the context of the Thirteenth General Programme of Work, 2019-2023.
The WHO Rapid Access Expansion Programme supports high-burden countries to increase coverage of diagnostic, treatment and referral services for the major causes of death among children under 5 years of age (diarrhoea, pneumonia and malaria) through the scaling up of integrated community case management. The purpose of this evaluation was to assess the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, impact and sustainability of the results of the Programme in order to inform policy dialogue and future design and implementation of integrated community case management.
The terms of reference of the WHO global coordination mechanism on the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases included a preliminary evaluation of the mechanism by the World Health Assembly, to take place in 2017, in order to assess its results and added value. The evaluation report was presented to the Seventy-first Health Assembly in May 2018.
In 2012, the Sixty-fifth World Health Assembly adopted resolution WHA65.19, in which it decided to establish a Member State mechanism aimed at protecting public health and promoting access to affordable, safe, efficacious, and quality medical products, by promoting the prevention and control of substandard/spurious/falsely-labelled/falsified/counterfeit (SSFFC) medical products and associated activities. This resolution renewed and re-established a mandate for the Secretariat and Member States in addressing SSFFC medical products from a public health perspective in a transparent and inclusive way. The Member State mechanism is supported by WHO and facilitated by the mechanism secretariat.
A review of the Member State mechanism was mandated by the above resolution and conducted by the WHO Evaluation Office. A review of the Member State mechanism was mandated by the above resolution and conducted by the WHO Evaluation Office.
The global strategy on public health, innovation and intellectual property aims to promote new thinking on innovation and access to medicines and, based on the recommendations of the report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health, provide a medium-term framework for securing an enhanced and sustainable basis for needs-driven essential health research and development relevant to diseases that disproportionately affect developing countries, proposing clear objectives and priorities for research and development, and estimating funding needs in this area.
The overall purpose of this comprehensive evaluation was to assess the status of implementation of the eight elements of the global strategy and plan of action, its 25 sub-elements and 108 specific actions. It looked at such implementation by all stakeholders listed in the action plan at different levels (global, regional and national), including national governments, the WHO Secretariat and other relevant stakeholders.
Covering the period 2008–2015, the evaluation documented achievements, gaps and remaining challenges and the evaluators have identified areas for future work and proposed recommendations which the overall programme review, planned for 2017, may wish to consider.